Power Simulations of Rare Event Counts and Introduction to the ‘Power Lift’ Metric
Ian T. Adams
Abstract
Objectives: This study addresses the significant challenge of estimating statistical power for experiments involving rare but impactful events, where traditional power analysis models, assuming normal distribution, inadequately estimate required sample sizes. It introduces a simulation framework leveraging Poisson regression models to better capture the dynamics of rare event occurrences and their impact on power calculations.Methods: Using Poisson distributions, a comprehensive simulation framework systematically assesses the interplay between sample size, effect size, and event occurrence rates. This approach is calibrated against real-world criminological constraints to ensure relevance and applicability. A key innovation is the "power lift" metric, devised to provide a more stable estimation of the required sample sizes by addressing the inherent instability in power simulations for rare events.Results: The simulation reveals intricate relationships between effect size, sample size, and event rates, underscoring the challenge of achieving sufficient statistical power in studies of rare events. The "power lift" metric emerges as a robust tool for determining sample size requirements, offering greater stability across various scenarios. Results are operationalized through user-friendly simulation code and a quick reference table, providing practical tools for researchers.Conclusions: The study advances a methodological framework for power analysis in the context of rare events in criminology. By integrating the "power lift" metric and a Poisson regression-based simulation framework, it offers researchers a more accurate and reliable means of estimating sample sizes for statistically robust investigations into rare but socially significant events.Keywords: power analysis, rare events, count models, simulation
Summary
Researchers studying rare but serious events like police shootings or misconduct cases often struggle to determine how large their studies need to be to detect meaningful patterns, because traditional statistical methods don’t work well for infrequent occurrences. This study developed a new simulation approach and a “power lift” metric that helps researchers calculate the right sample sizes when studying these rare events using more appropriate statistical models. This advancement gives policing researchers better tools to design studies that can reliably detect important trends and effects in critical but uncommon incidents, leading to more robust evidence for policy decisions.
(AI-generated summary, v1, January 2026)
Citation Information
Citations: 5 (as of June 2026)
Cite this work
Ian T. Adams (2024). Power Simulations of Rare Event Counts and Introduction to the ‘Power Lift’ Metric. CrimRxiv. https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.dfc6b8fa
@article{adams2024,
title = {Power Simulations of Rare Event Counts and Introduction to the ‘Power Lift’ Metric},
author = {Ian T. Adams},
journal = {CrimRxiv},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.21428/cb6ab371.dfc6b8fa},
url = {https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.dfc6b8fa}
} Related publications
- Restorative justice and the evidence hierarchy: Implications for policy and practice Chandler G. Robinson, Matthew W. Logan, Brandon C. Dulisse, Ian T. Adams, Mark A. Morgan · Evidence Base · 2026
- Emotional Intelligence, Policing, and the Military Veteran Influence Elizabeth A. Quinby, Irick A. Geary Jr., Matthew W. Logan, Ian T. Adams, Kyle D. McLean · Armed Forces & Society · 2026
- Experimentally falsifying ghost criminology: Exercising rigor, exorcising residue Ian T. Adams · Theory and Society · 2026
- AI-Generated Human Stimuli for Experimental Social Science Chandler G. Robinson, Ian T. Adams, Matthew W. Logan, J. Pete Blair · Journal of Experimental Criminology · 2026